Understanding Brain Connectivity: Exploring Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials

Aisha Khan & Faisal R. Jahangiri

Introduction:

The human brain, frequently called the most intricate organ, is a remarkable feat of biological design. Scientists in neuroscience are constantly striving to comprehend its intricate networks and communication systems. One captivating area of research in this field is Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials (CCEPs), which provide a window into the dynamic interplay of neural circuits within the brain.

Unveiling the Neuronal Communication:

CCEPs refer to the electrical responses that occur in one region of the cerebral cortex when another region is stimulated. Imagine the brain as a symphony, with different areas acting as instruments playing in harmony. CCEPs allow researchers to eavesdrop on this symphony, providing valuable insights into the patterns and pathways of neuronal communication.

Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) are a way to measure the activity increase in a specific area of the brain that results from stimulating a different location. This is done by passing a single electrical stimulation pulse through cortical electrodes and recording the responses from other cortical sites. A negative deflection, known as the N1, is seen at 10-50 ms post-stimulation and is a marker for direct cortico-cortical connectivity [1]. Recording CCEPs has become helpful in monitoring brain pathways during surgery, particularly language-related ones.

Neurosurgeons face the critical task of preserving brain function after treating brain lesions. To achieve this, they must demonstrate a thorough understanding of the neural connectivity between cortical eloquent regions and their function, vasculature, and structure [2]. While intraoperative high-frequency electrical stimulation is the preferred method for mapping the functionality of white matter and cortices, it falls short in its ability to monitor large-scale cortical networks in real-time [2]. One solution to this limitation is using CCEPs during intraoperative procedures, which can overcome the challenge of only being able to map focal functions.

The CCEP technique was initially developed as an intraoperative procedure for epilepsy surgery. Its clinical use involves the exploration of functional networks and seizure propagation to pinpoint epileptogenicity through subdural or depth electrodes [2]. One of the practical benefits of CCEPs is that they don't require a patient to perform a task during stimulation. In addition to its practicality, CCEP monitoring is also feasible, making it a valuable tool for intraoperative monitoring of brain networks, primarily focusing on language and motor function [2].

During a surgical procedure, the CCEP mapping technique is utilized to closely monitor the dorsal language pathway, responsible for the sensorimotor mapping of sound to articulation and auditory feedback control. Moreover, CCEP mapping also enables the mapping of the frontal aslant tract, a crucial white matter tract that links multiple motor areas in the brain. By precisely tracking the connectivity between these areas, CCEP mapping facilitates the monitoring of large-scale cortical networks and significantly contributes to preserving brain function postoperatively.

Challenges and Future Directions:

CCEPs offer a unique opportunity to study the brain's communication networks, but some challenges must be overcome. The invasive nature of electrode implantation limits the number of human studies, and ethical considerations must be considered. Researchers are exploring non-invasive techniques such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to address these limitations.

However, the future of CCEP research is promising. With technological advances, we may soon have more precise and less invasive methods for studying cortical connectivity. Additionally, combining CCEP data with other neuroimaging techniques could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the brain's dynamic network.

Conclusion:

The study of Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials is a powerful tool that enables us to gain unprecedented insights into how the brain communicates. As we unravel the complexities of cortical connectivity, the potential applications of CCEP studies for fundamental neuroscience and clinical interventions are nothing short of remarkable. This dynamic field has enormous potential to shed light on the enigmas of the human brain and could revolutionize our approach to neurological conditions and cognitive improvement.

References

1.     Silverstein BH, Asano E, Sugiura A, Sonoda M, Lee MH, Jeong JW. Dynamic tractography: Integrating cortico-cortical evoked potentials and diffusion imaging. Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116763. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116763. Epub 2020 Apr 12. PMID: 32294537; PMCID: PMC7292749.

2.     Yamao Y, Matsumoto R, Kikuchi T, Yoshida K, Kunieda T, Miyamoto S. Intraoperative Brain Mapping by Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potential. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Feb 18;15:635453. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.635453. PMID: 33679353; PMCID: PMC7930065.

3.     Ries SK, Piai V, Perry D, Griffin S, Jordan K, Henry R, Knight RT, Berger MS. Roles of ventral versus dorsal pathways in language production: An awake language mapping study. Brain Lang. 2019 Apr;191:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Feb 12. PMID: 30769167; PMCID: PMC6402581.

4.     La Corte E, Eldahaby D, Greco E, Aquino D, Bertolini G, Levi V, Ottenhausen M, Demichelis G, Romito LM, Acerbi F, Broggi M, Schiariti MP, Ferroli P, Bruzzone MG, Serrao G. The Frontal Aslant Tract: A Systematic Review for Neurosurgical Applications. Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 24;12:641586. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.641586. PMID: 33732210; PMCID: PMC7959833.

5.     Kikuchi T., Matsumoto R., Mikuni N., Yokoyama Y., Matsumoto A., Ikeda A., et al.. (2012). Asymmetric bilateral effect of the supplementary motor area proper in the human motor system. Clin. Neurophysiol. 123, 324–334. 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.06.011

6.     Kobayashi K., Matsumoto R., Usami K., Matsuhashi M., Shimotake A., Kikuchi T., et al.. (2021). Cortico-cortical evoked potential by single-pulse electrical stimulation is a generally safe procedure. Clin. Neurophysiol. (in press). 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.12.022

7.     Matsumoto R., Nair D. R., Lapresto E., Bingaman W., Shibasaki H., Lüders H. O. (2007). Functional connectivity in human cortical motor system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study. Brain 130, 181–197. 10.1093/brain/awl257

8.     Matsumoto R., Nair D. R., Lapresto E., Najm I., Bingaman W., Shibasaki H., et al.. (2004). Functional connectivity in the human language system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study. Brain 127, 2316–2330. 10.1093/brain/awh246 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9.     Kunieda T, Yamao Y, Kikuchi T, Matsumoto R. New Approach for Exploring Cerebral Functional Connectivity: Review of Cortico-cortical Evoked Potential. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55(5):374-82. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0388. Epub 2015 Apr 28. PMID: 25925755; PMCID: PMC4628165.